Tag: creative practice

  • The Difference Between Inspiration and Momentum

    The Difference Between Inspiration and Momentum

    The difference between inspiration and momentum - text

    Introduction

    A lot of creative people, myself included at times, talk about inspiration like it’s a tap you can turn on. As if the right mood, the right setting, or the right moment will suddenly unlock everything. I used to think the same, and sometimes still do unfortunately.

    The problem is that inspiration is wildly unreliable. It shows up uninvited when you’re in the shower, and it vanishes entirely when you sit down to actually create something. If build your creative process around waiting for it, you’ll spend more time waiting than making.

    There’s a better way to think about this. It’s not about inspiration vs. no inspiration. It’s about understanding what inspiration actually is, and replacing the waiting with something that works.

    Inspiration is unpredictable. Momentum isn’t.

    Inspiration is a feeling. It’s real. It’s useful. It absolutely makes creative work feel easier. But like any feeling, you can’t schedule it, summon it reliably, or make it last.

    Momentum, on the other hand, is mechanical. It doesn’t care how you feel. It just requires motion… small, consistent actions that keep the work alive even when the feeling isn’t there.

    Think of a car engine. You don’t need to feel enthusiastic to start it. You just turn the key. The car doesn’t know you’re tired or distracted. It just runs.

    Your creative practice works the same way. When you show up and do something, even something small, the machine keeps turning over. When you stop, it gets cold and harder to start again.

    James Clear captures this well: he notes that professionals don’t wait for inspiration to strike, they follow a schedule and show up regardless. The schedule is what produces the work; inspiration is what occasionally makes it feel wonderful. (Source: The Myth of Creative Inspiration, JamesClear.com)

    Waiting doesn’t preserve creative energy: it kills rhythm.

    There’s a quiet lie we tell ourselves when we skip a creative session: “I’ll do it when I’m more inspired.” It sounds reasonable. Protective, even. But what it actually does is break rhythm.

    Rhythm, the habit of returning to your work regularly, is one of the most underrated creative assets you can build. Once it’s broken, restarting is harder than it sounds. The longer the gap, the more the work starts to feel unfamiliar, and the higher the mental barrier to getting back in.

    Research from Scott Barry Kaufman and colleagues (published in Harvard Business Review) found that inspiration is more self-sustaining than most people realise but only once you’re already actively engaged with your work. In other words, inspiration doesn’t arrive to start the process. It tends to show up inside the process, once you’ve already begun. (Source: Why Inspiration Matters, Harvard Business Review)

    Waiting doesn’t protect your creativity. It drains it slowly while you’re not looking.

    Action creates inspiration, not the other way around.

    This is the part that most people get backwards.

    We assume inspiration has to come first, that we need to feel sparked, interested, or motivated before we can do anything useful. But in practice, it usually works in reverse. You start doing something, and the doing generates the feeling, et voila inspiration.

    Start writing a song and you’ll often find the melody somewhere in the third or fourth attempt at a chord progression. Start writing a blog post and the real point of the post surfaces during the second or third paragraph. The action doesn’t require inspiration. It produces it.

    This is why even a minimum viable session, just 15 or 20 minutes of turning up, is worth more than waiting for the perfect mood. You’re not just making progress. You’re creating the conditions for inspiration to arrive.

    “Motivation comes after starting, not before.” Is a principle well-supported by creativity researchers and summed up simply: the emotional state you’re waiting for is often a byproduct of the work, not a prerequisite for it.

    Practical takeaway

    If you find yourself waiting to feel inspired before you start:

    • Set a minimum: five minutes, one idea, one sentence. Just something.
    • Treat showing up as the creative act, regardless of output quality.
    • Notice what happens when you start anyway. Nine times out of ten, the inspiration follows.

    The goal isn’t to stop wanting inspiration. It’s to stop depending on it.

    Momentum is what keeps your creative practice alive between the inspired moments. And the good news is, you build it the same way every time, by starting.


    Thank you for reading this post. Please share your thoughts in the comment section below.
    namaste
    d
    xox

    If you enjoyed this post please support my writing by making a donation of any amount.

    Sign up for my (ir)regular newsletter to keep up to date with my creative adventures, including special offers, and join me on Instagram | YouTube | Twitter | Pinterest

  • What I believed about creativity that turned out to be wrong

    What I believed about creativity that turned out to be wrong

    Some creative beliefs only make sense in hindsight. I believed in perfection, I needed faith in the imperfect.

    Beliefs shape behaviour

    Believing something is impossible means we will not even try to do it. If we think we will never be a writer, a painter or a composer, we will not even attempt to be one. However, if I think I can write a sentence, a paragraph, then I will. If I believe I can add a brush stroke I will. If I know I can hum a tune, I will compose.

    Early assumptions often wrong

    My personality type means I like to see the big picture. I like to see a perfect, complete creation. I thought something I created, a song, a drawing, a story, needed to be perfect. If the idea in my head had little to no relation to what I was creating then I’d lose interest. I didn’t create.

    It wasn’t until later I learnt that this was something I could address. It was part of me, but I didn’t have to let it control my creative output.

    Experience changes perspective

    I spent years as a commissioning editor for a publishing house. I was always encouraging my authors to think about small chunks of their work. They didn’t have to “worry” about the editing, the layout, the cover… their primary focus had to be the words they were writing.

    It is often a fact that it is easier to see the mistakes others are making while ignoring ourselves doing similar. It took me years to learn that. Perhaps it won’t take you as long.

    Just to add, once those words were written by the authors, then they could engage in editing, marketing and cover discussions.

    Growth requires revision

    It isn’t just about one belief. We pick up many beliefs as we develop our creative practice. We listen or watch others create. We learn from tutorials or are taught at schools and universities. We learn. However, some things that are learnt, may not work for us, or they may take us down a wrong path. For years, I had believed music had to be structured in a certain way. I had failed to understand that rules underpin, they create frameworks for us to hang our creative acts upon. Rules and beliefs are also there to be broken, when required. There is nothing as liberating as breaking a creative rule and discovering something beautiful.

    Creatives do this all the time. We should always be revising what and how we create; as we revise we grow.

    Learning never stops

    I mentioned being taught. There is nothing wrong with going to college or university and learning a creative process or skill. We all “learn” to some extent. Our challenge is to keep learning. Just like breaking rules and growing through revision, we should never stop learning new techniques, skills or creating in unique ways. Those of us who use technology as a creative tool need to constantly keep our eye on software as it develops. There is also the use of A.I. What is our stance on using it? More and more software, and hardware, is integrating it. Perhaps we currently steer clear because the energy cost in data centres. But A.I. will soon be portable, using only the battery charge on our phones, tablets or laptops. I’m not advocating for or against its use, but it is an example of how things change, and change means learning, or adapting, how to create within such environments.

    So…

    I believed my creations needed to be perfect. I was wrong. Learning that has enabled me to create, and enjoy creating.

    Do you have any beliefs that are stopping you from creating?


    Thank you for reading this post. Please share your thoughts in the comment section below.
    namaste
    d
    xox

    If you enjoyed this post please support my writing by making a donation of any amount.

    Sign up for my (ir)regular newsletter to keep up to date with my creative adventures, including special offers, and join me on Instagram | YouTube | Twitter | Pinterest